Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid
Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid Podcast
The Qasim Rashid Show - Episode 135
0:00
Current time: 0:00 / Total time: -51:50
-51:50

The Qasim Rashid Show - Episode 135

On this week's episode I welcome Tim Whitaker, musician, creator, and founder of The New Evangelicals to discuss the rise of left wing Christianity, abortion, & human rights

On this week’s episode of The Qasim Rashid Show:

  • I welcome Tim Whitaker, a musician and founder and creator of The New Evangelicals. How did Tim go from a staunch Rush Limbaugh conservative who marched in the “March for Life” as a teen— to now attending the DNC and leading one of the largest movements nationwide for left wing Christianity as an adult? Tune in to find out, and be sure to follow Tim and his team across social media @TheNewEvangelicals.

  • I also discuss gender apartheid under the Taliban, the history of how we got here, and what we must do to protect women’s rights globally.

Subscribe for $6/mo or $50/year to support my efforts to advance human rights, demand media accountability, and keep you informed on the key issues that impact our lives

Why Your Support Matters: Every dollar we spend is a vote for the kind of future we want. Help me create a future more committed to justice and universal human rights. Subscribe, and I welcome your thoughts, feedback, and insights. Thank you.

Discussion about this episode

I see the AI issue was not clear. Thanks!

Expand full comment

Qasim, thank you again for correcting me and teaching me what I had no way to know as someone who is not Muslim.

As for Tim Whitaker, of course abortion is murder, technically. We made exceptions for early fetuses. But anyone who gets caught up in the abortion-is-murder argument should also acknowledge that spanking your child is assault and battery, taking your child to school on a day your child doesn't want to go (bad mood, tantrum, inhibited on first day) is kidnapping and hostage-taking, etc.

Mr Whitaker says that there's nothing in "the bible" (any bible) against abortion, and he is sort of right. There's nothing in any bible that mentions abortion per se, but the OT does command believers (Mr Whitaker and anyone else can believe what they like, but there's no proof or evidence of any of this, and people apparently choose which bible they want to follow) to "be fruitful and multiply." It is possible for someone to take that to mean that abortion should be forbidden, but equally, anyone who wants to follow directives like that should have 15-20 children, or as many as possible representing every time the woman is fertile. So clearly, no one is following any bible when it comes to treasuring the possibility of children. This is again people acting as if they know that there's such a thing as "god," whether or not "god" has a son/Messiah, whether or not there's a Prophet of "god," etc. If people can know all of this, and which bibles are more correct than which other bibles, then people are "god."

Further, people like the long-haired shrieker at the convention can have any idea they like about who should lead a country, in what ways, and with what agenda, but this country has a Constitution, which has been amended, and the First Amendment takes all the wind out of that boy's sails. If he thinks "god" and Jesus should be the ruling determinants, then he needs to move to some other country. The First Amendment was not a careless mistake. The Founding Fathers thought and talked long and hard about it, and voted on it, and this is the democracy/republic they gave us. Someone's personal fantasy about how they would have liked it to have gone is not relevant. Unless they want to repeal the First Amendment, and it's a complicated legislative process.

Expand full comment

A Republican group is running an ad in Michigan that looks like a Harris ad, that says Harris stands with Israel and against Palestinian hate. They are getting nastier and nastier.

Expand full comment

Mr Mansour, Harris has affirmed her "ironclad" support for Israel (in its annihilation of Palestinians). She herself said she stands with Israel and against Palestinians. It's hard to dismiss that as nasty, except that it ignores that Trump feels the same way.

It's one-sided, but it's not untrue.

Expand full comment

She has not taken a stand against Palestinians.

Expand full comment

My point was that it was deceptive.

Expand full comment

It is deceptive on the part of the RNC.

Expand full comment

It also leaves out her expressed concern over the loss of life in Gaza, about which she was quite forceful.

Expand full comment

Yes, she did express ironclad support for Israel and concern for Palestinians. Chris Hayes was in a conversation tonight in which it was said that is difficult to go against Israel, so this includes Netanyahu in our political environment. Is it AIPAC? Is it just money or more?

Expand full comment

The deception was that the GOP made and aired a commercial meant to appear as a Harris commercial.

Expand full comment

Yes, and this will probably get a lot worse...

Expand full comment

I'm not sure what the deception was. If someone said Harris stands with Israel against Palestinians, she would confirm that herself. The main thing that would have made voting for Biden, which I was going to do, or voting for Harris, which I will do, not heart-rendingly tragic is that the alternative is Trump.

Expand full comment

The deception is for the GOP to make an ad and attribute it to Harris.

Expand full comment

Yikes!!! That is a huge political problem...Michigan is a must win state, and I think the home of many "Uncommitteds"....

Expand full comment

Personally, I have not heard a strong stance from Harris in support of Palestine but I haven't heard many of her speeches. So in response to your post, isn't it possible to support a 'state' of Israel while at the same time condeming racism and hatred towards the indigenous people of Palestine? Maybe i'm missing something here.

Expand full comment

I think that is her position, but this ad can do tremendous damage...

Expand full comment

Please elaborate, how does it do damage? is the concern that folks want her administration to take a position on one side or the other? Your thoughts?

Expand full comment

The damage is that the trump administration is doing IA ads, pretending to be her, and they put words in her mouth. That is dangerous. Candidates must not have other pretend to be them. Words can be nuanced.

Expand full comment

The whole world, except Biden, Harris, and AIPAC, consider this to be completely unacceptable genocide of innocents, and to be war crimes. Should Harris not also adopt that position? She has said very recently that Israel/Netanyahu have her "ironclad" support, as they have had Biden's, and she did not advocate for stopping sending weapons and money. So she has taken a position on one side or the other.

It's also importantly worth noting that Qasim recently published a post that showed that many more votes for Harris would be gained by her stopping arming Israel than would be lost by stopping. So she's taken a position, and if it does "tremendous damage," as Gail Breakey says, Harris is doing that damage to herself. She doesn't have to make this choice, and more or less the entire world doesn't want her to.

Expand full comment

Fred. I am commenting on the RMC doing IA ads pretending they are from Harris.

Expand full comment

Gail, you've left a few comments, and they're not one after another. I'll do my best.

The RNC ads might as well be from Harris. She agrees with them. No one put words in her mouth. She, like Biden, said Israel has the Dem administration's (and our) "ironclad" support. If quoting her damages her, then she should change her stated policy and position. In my opinion, she's wrong. So was Biden. So was Trump.

And why is it difficult to call an end to this? Innocents are being annihilated, Israel is way ahead, and it's all with our support. Do you have children? If the older one is pummeling and badly damaging the younger one, would it seem difficult for you to intervene, because the older one is your child? Even if someone made the two-dimensional argument that Hamas did anything wrong, all the Palestinians the Israelis are annihilating didn't do anything wrong. They have been continuous victims for several or more decades.

If Harris is as worried as you are about how Michiganders might vote, she knows why they're "uncommitted." Harris', Biden's, Trump's policy about Israel's destruction of Palestinians is not popular, even if they can't realize it's wrong. If they want those voters committed to them, they know what change to make.

As for who's in charge, can I ask you to guess who Biden hopes will win? If Harris can present herself in a certain way, and mount a certain argument, that is more likely to result in her victory than Trump's, Biden will adopt it. As Mark Mansour noted (if Harris knows this fact), Qasim Rashid published a post in which he made clear that stopping this (a long time ago) would accrue to Harris' advantage. It wouldn't disadvantage her.

Expand full comment

Fred, I am persuaded by people who have interacted with the campaign that she gets it, but can only go so for right now because Biden doesn’t want to go very far in criticizing Israel. I wonder whether Bibi’s continued rejection of the peace terms will finally cause him to snap, but I doubt it. He won’t cut off arms.

Expand full comment

By the way, Mark, despite anything Biden says he did, or is considered to have done, that was good for this country, for me, all of it has been displaced by his acquiescence to Netanyahu, in terms of his "legacy." Fully supporting Netanyahu in his crusade to eliminate Palestinians is his legacy. "Whatever you want, Bibi," is the same as Trump's "Whatever you want, Vlad," or "whatever you want, Kim." Biden surrendered decency and any sense of feeling for other people. And as you say, every indication is that he's irretrievable. Even if he stopped today, which you no doubt rightly say he won't, there are tens or hundreds of thousands of dead Palestinians who aren't coming back, and Netanyahu claims to have enough of a stockpile now that he can manage to finish off the rest on his own.

Expand full comment

I am distraught about it all. And people are apparently ignorant of what is happening in the West Bank.

Expand full comment

Right. And the last time Netanyahu set on the West Bank was a day or two ago. He's working hard to finish this off, and for all I know, he might have gotten a vibe that he has to do it while he has Biden in his pocket, because if Harris wins, the party's over.

Expand full comment

Mark, if you're right, it's theoretically all the more reason not to have Biden running, although you would have a hard time reassuring Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip that Harris is any better.

Biden has alleged that he suggests to Netanyahu that there be a ceasefire, but he takes no for an answer.

Expand full comment

Alas, you are correct. Those of us who are outraged by what is happening in Gaza are left to hope for the best, while pressuring the administration (assuming she wins) to take meaningful action. I’ve been in Democratic politics for decades and I’ve made my opinion clear to them.

Expand full comment

Fred, this is absolutely true:

It's also importantly worth noting that Qasim recently published a post that showed that many more votes for Harris would be gained by her stopping arms.

Expand full comment

Yes, I read that post, and it makes it more infuriating that she does what the whole world doesn't want her to do, at unfathomable expense to Palestinians, and even at cost to her.

Expand full comment

She is not running the Presidency yet. This is Bidens domain.

Expand full comment