Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nancy Potter's avatar

NPR was discussing the new anti-women rules in Afghanistan and one of them is to forbid (or strongly discourage) women from speaking loudly or laughing in public. I was reminded of a political candidate who is currently criticizing his female opponent's laugh. Women's visibility and women's joy seem to be an anathema to many, even if they don't claim to follow something in the Qur'an.

Expand full comment
B.Ruth. Cornwell's avatar

I know that many US and Canadian women were motivated to support western intervention to displace the Taliban in the first instance owing to the excruciating inhumane conditions imposed on the females of the nation. As Trump's perfidy restored Taliban strength and violence to Afghanistan and left foreign forces humiliated as they were withdrawn for petty political reasons,, those of us following the debacle immediately understood that the restoration of the Taliban to power would result in the re-enslavement of Afghan women. Enslavement is the correct term. Having no rights to life itself, let alone a life worth living is true slavery. Females are made of no account, mere domestic slaves who can be killed, tortured, with impunity. All this enshrined in so-called "laws" that have no basis in global human rights, nor in any legitimate religion which they claim to represent and promote.

It is apocalyptic to know that the far right extreme fringes of the male persuasion are rubbing their bloody hands with glee to see this model of depravity, actually ruling a nation and in complete control of females, and no doubt plotting to spread their toxic doctrines; even as our own evangelical tyrants screech about their god given instructions to do the same to "free world" females.

I sometimes theorize that the most fundamental division among humans on this planet is the chasm between male and female.

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts